Competition Act 2023
What is the competition act?
India's commercial competition is governed under the
Competition Act, 2023 (the Act), which replaced the
erstwhile Competition Act, 2002 and the Monopolies
and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969. The main
goal of these Acts was to stop actions that have a
negative influence on competition in the Indian market.
The Competition Act, 2002 legislation led to the
establishment of the Competition Commission of India
(the Commission or the CCI), charged with preventing
activities that hinder competition within India.
The Act empowers the Commission to safeguard the
interests of free and fair competition, including the
competitive process, thereby protecting consumers'
interests. Its main responsibilities are as follows:
- Prohibiting agreements or practices that have, or
are likely to have, a significant adverse effect on
competition in the Indian market (horizontal and
vertical agreements/conduct)
- Prohibiting the abuse of dominant positions in the
market
- Prohibiting acquisitions, mergers, amalgamations,
etc. between enterprises that have, or are likely to
have, a considerable adverse effect on competition
in the Indian market(s)
Furthermore, the Competition Act, 2002 emphasized
international cooperation and enforcement by
envisioning mutual support and a global enforcement
network.
Over time, the Competition Act, 2002, underwent
amendments through the Competition (Amendment)
Act, 2007, and the Competition (Amendment) Act, 2009.
Why the changes
The Competition Act, 2002, was enacted with the aim
of curbing abuse of dominance and monopolies in the
Indian market. Since its implementation, the Indian
market experienced significant growth, witnessing a
surge in internet-based businesses and companies
leveraging technological advancements. Recognizing
these developments and in alignment with India's everexpanding
economic fundamentals, the Ministry of
Corporate Affairs (MCA) established the Competition
Law Review Committee (CLRC) in 2018. The CLRC was
tasked with assessing the Act's implementation and
its coherence with the evolving market landscape. In
2019, certain gaps and drawbacks were identified in
the existing framework, leading to recommendations
for structured management of market competition.
Considering the Standing Committee’s suggestions, the
MCA introduced additional amendments and presented
the draft to the Parliament in February 2023. After due
consideration of the report, the Lok Sabha passed
the Competition (Amendment) Bill, 2023 in March
2023, and the Rajya Sabha subsequently passed it in
April 2023, effecting changes to the two-decade-old
Competition Act, 2002.
The proposed Competition (Amendment) Bill, 2023
aims to revamp India's current competition law in
response to instances of anti-competitive conduct
by major corporations, particularly in the technology
industry.
Recent Cases that triggered the Amendments:
- Google was fined USD 21 million by the CCI in
2018 for abusing its dominant position in online
search advertising, a decision that was upheld by
the Competition Appellate Tribunal in 2020. Data
being considered more vital than the turnover of
the entity, tech giants such as Google enjoy the
opportunity to acquire significant firms in the data
processing realm lacking turnover generation.
Introducing a ‘deal value threshold’ under
the proposed amendment would bring these
instances under the purview of CCI. Furthermore,
due to expansion of penalty provisions through
the current amendment, larger penalties can be
imposed over the ‘global turnover’ of enterprises.
Such terms could allow the CCI to impose greater
penalties similar to the European Union, where
Google had to incur a fine of over USD 4 billion.
- Amazon was accused of engaging in predatory
pricing and providing preferential treatment for
certain sellers on its platform, which led to an
investigation by the CCI and a finding that Amazon
had violated Competition Act.
- The Facebook-WhatsApp acquisition also raised
concerns about data privacy and competition in
the messaging app market, and the CCI found
that the acquisition had reduced competitive
constraints in the market. However, due
to threshold constraints, the CCI could not
investigate the issue even though around 130
million users were affected. Acquisitions of such
sorts are, per se, beyond the scope of the CCI as
the target company is small enough to escape
the Competition Act thresholds. Considering
transactional value under the proposed
amendment became crucial for expanding the
investigative scope of the CCI.
Summary of amendments and impacts
- Introduction of deal value thresholds – Deals with
a transaction value of more than INR 2,000 crore
(USD ~250 mn) will require prior approval of the
CCI. The aim of introducing a deal value threshold
is to bring certain deals under the Act’s purview,
such as deals by large technology and digital
platforms where a target may not hold significant
assets or turnover in India, provided that the target
has ‘substantial business operations’ in India. This
is an additional threshold prescribed over and
above the existing asset- and turnover-based tests
and, noticeably, is applicable across sectors of the
economy and not merely confined to digital markets
as was originally recommended in the CLRC Report,
2018.
Difference from Competition Act, 2002:
The 2002 Act included ‘gross assets of more than
INR 1,000 crores (USD ~125 mn), or gross turnover of
more than INR 3,000 crores (USD ~375 mn)’, amongst
others to be the threshold limits in case of AAEC
cases.
- Reduction of time-limit for approvals of
combinations (M&As) from two hundred and ten
days (210) to one hundred and fifty (150) days and
for forming a prima facie opinion by the CCI to
issue a show cause notice to parties within fifteen
days (15) from the previous thirty days (30) for
expeditious approval of combinations. Furthermore,
the CCI has to form its prima facie opinion of
whether the proposed combination is likely to cause
an Appreciable Adverse Effect on Competition
(AAEC) in India or not within thirty (30) calendar
days (whereas the Competition Act, 2023 states
thirty (30) working days). If no prima facie opinion
is formed within this period, the combination shall
be deemed to have been approved.
- The new Act has modified the definition of
‘control’, and defined it as “the ability to exercise
material influence over the management, affairs, or
strategic commercial decisions”.
The new definition of ‘Group’ under Section 5 of
the Act states that “two or more enterprises where
one enterprise is directly or indirectly, in a position
to exercise twenty six percent (26%), or such other
higher percentage as may be prescribed, of the
voting rights in the other enterprise”.
Difference from Competition Act, 2002:
‘Control’ was defined as having control over the
management/affairs over an enterprise or group.
This classifies businesses into a range of enterprises
exercising control over other enterprises.
The new Act modifies such description, while making
it more precise and specific, as the ability to exercise
material influence and impact over the strategic and
important commercial decisions of the enterprise,
inclusive of its management and crucial affairs.
- The Act extends the Director General-CCI’s (DG)
powers to investigate defilements under the Act.
This includes the DG’s power to seek information
and papers from legal advisors appointed by the
parties.
- Waiver of standstill obligations for open market
purchases: The existing ‘standstill obligations’ in
case of an open offer and acquisition of convertible
shares/securities on a stock exchange is waived off
provided:
- a. A merger notification is promptly filed with the
CCI; and
- b. The acquirer does not exercise any ownership
or beneficial rights/interest/receives dividends
in such shares/securities till the receipt of
approval from the CCI
- Introduction of ‘Green Channel’ or deemed
approval for certain categories of combination not
likely to have an AAEC:
- The CCI, through regulations, introduced the
‘Green Channel’ for automatic approval of
combinations in August 2019 in the spirit of
promoting trust-based regulation
- It was the first of its kind system in the world
wherein transactions were automatically
deemed approved on the day of filing. This
dispensation is presently available to those
parties that do not exhibit overlap, be it
horizontal, vertical, or complementary
- Increased penalty for making false statements
or suppressing material information related to
the proposed combination: Under the existing
provisions, any person being a party to a
combination who either makes a false statement
or omits to disclose any material information is
liable to a minimum penalty of INR 50 lakhs (USD
~62,500) and a maximum penalty of INR 1 crore
(USD ~125,000). The maximum penalty has now
been increased to INR 5 crores (USD ~625,000).
- Penalties to be imposed on ‘Global’ Turnover:
Enterprises found guilty of violation of the provisions of the Competition Act, 2002 (the Act)
can now be penalized up to ten percent (10%) of
not only their total turnover derived from revenue
generated from the sale of all products and services
within India but also from all over the globe.
- The Competition Act, 2023 proposes to recognize
the ‘hubs and spokes’ (hubs are facilitators and
spokes are direct competition) arrangement of
the Competition Act, 2002, which means that the
parties who are not actively involved in cartel
formation but merely intend to participate in
its furtherance can also be penalized for such
formation.
A hub and spoke cartel is one where market
players at the horizontal level (spokes) enter
into an agreement, tacit, or explicit, to share
sensitive information through a vertical common
player, referred to as a ‘hub’. Although not directly
involved in its activities, the hub acts as a medium
to facilitate the cartel mainly by acting as an
information exchange mechanism.
Difference from Competition Act, 2002:
The earlier framework states ‘anti-competitive
agreements’ involving horizontal agreements, i.e.
between enterprises indulged in similar or identical
business activities, and vertical agreements, i.e.
between parties at diverse stages or levels of the
same production chain.
The current Act adds non-competitor and non-market
participant enterprises engaged in dissimilar or
different business activities, not actively involved in
cartel activities, while merely ‘intending to participate’
or ‘actively coordinating in the furtherance of such
deals which are rendered as causing an AAEC’.
- Widening the net to include agreements other than
vertical anti-competitive agreements between
manufacturers and dealers: Now, all kinds of
business agreements, not even restricted to those
between enterprises or persons, are vulnerable to
scrutiny if they are likely to cause an AAEC. This
will include clauses such as non-compete clauses/
parity clauses used by online travel agents for
hotels/air ticket bookings, etc. and will include
AI-driven arrangements which may cause an AAEC.
- Introduction of Settlements and Commitment: The
CCI is empowered to initiate inquiry proceedings
on contravention of provisions like Section 3 (anticompetitive
agreements), Section 430 (abuse of
dominance), Section 19 (inquiry), etc. Furthermore,
the present amendment brings in the following
options, after which it may close the inquiry
proceedings:
- Settlement, referring to an agreement between
the CCI and a party under investigation to
terminate proceedings upon payment of a
settlement amount by the party; and
- Commitment, involving an undertaking given
by a party under investigation to modify its
conduct or take certain actions to eliminate
any concerns raised by the CCI regarding its
conduct
- Introduction of ‘leniency plus’: This will encourage
members of cartels under investigation to disclose
other cartels and obtain a waiver of penalties for
such cartels in advance.
Other Amendments to the provisions of the Act
- Widening the definition of ‘Relevant product market’
to include supply-side substitutability. The new
Act widens the scope of ‘Relevant product market’
to include products and services interchangeable
by not only the consumer but the supplier as well,
and also recognizes buyer cartels. This inculcates
the supplier’s perspective as well and is more
comprehensive than the previous descriptive
constraints. The term ‘party’ would include a
consumer and an information provider.
- Appointment of DG by the CCI, with prior approval
of the Central Government.
- Allowing parties to call expert witnesses to depose
before the CCI and provide their expert opinion
during the inquiry hearings before the CCI.
- Enhanced and well-codified powers of the DG to
investigate. These are now independent powers not
linked to the Companies Act, 2013 as was the case
before.
- Mandatory pre-deposit of a 25% penalty as a
condition precedent to admission of appeal
for hearing before the National Company Law
Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT).
- Compounding of any offense punishable under
the Act, excluding the offenses punishable with
imprisonment only or imprisonment with fine, by
the NCLAT or any other court where any proceeding
related to such offense is pending.