Our Comments
The Amendment Regulations made significant changes in the manner of preservation of records. Earlier the liquidator was required to preserve the records with himself or with the information utility. However, Amendment Regulations prescribe an onerous obligation to preserve the same with himself at a secure place in electronic as well as physical form. It further casts an obligation on the liquidator by requiring him to produce the same as may be required under the law. This is likely to increase the cost of liquidation as the liquidator will have to comply with this requirement post-dissolution of a corporate person and therefore has to incur cost relating to secure infrastructure. Although the DoS given by the directors/partners needs to state that the provision is made for the preservation of records, it does not cast any obligation on them in that relation after dissolution. After dissolution, the erstwhile directors/partners become functus officio; hence the purpose of changes to DoS just seems to assert that before the dissolution, such provision is made. While the preservation prescribed is in respect of records pertaining to the liquidation, but the law is silent on other statutory records pertaining to the corporate person and the person responsible for preserving the same. Therefore, it raises certain questions such as how the provision will be made in this relation, including the cost to be incurred for maintenance of such provision, who will be the responsible person to ensure the safe keeping of those corporate records, the timeline until which records should be preserved and disposal of the records.
|